Silicon Valley Bank has been a key player for years but was closed in March 2023. What led to this situation, and could it affect your bank?

Silicon Valley Bank played a crucial role for venture capitalists and the tech community. For instance, streaming giant Roku had approximately $500 million in assets there, while gaming company Roblox held around $150 million. A significant portion of tech firms were either depositors or borrowers at the bank. However, in March, the bank failed, prompting intervention from the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation. What went wrong?

Silicon Valley Bank's Journey During the Pandemic

To understand, let's look back. During and after the pandemic, venture capital and tech firms amassed substantial funds to invest in startups. Much of this capital found its way to Silicon Valley Bank, which experienced rapid growth from 2019 to late 2022. To manage risk, the bank invested its deposits in US Treasuries and Government Mortgage-backed securities (MBS).

Then came the Federal Reserve's rate hikes aimed at stabilizing the economy post-pandemic. This shift triggered several issues that contributed to Silicon Valley Bank's downfall. Venture-backed firms struggled to secure funding in a higher interest rate environment, leading them to deplete their deposits at the bank.

For instance, on March 10, 2021, a US Treasury bond with a 10-year maturity offered a 1.75% interest rate, priced at $104. Thus, purchasing a $1,000 bond would cost $1,040, yielding annual interest of $17.50 until maturity. (It's essential to remember that when rates rise, bond prices fall.)

Critical Errors Leading to the Bank's Demise

The issue emerged when interest rates climbed significantly. If you bought that bond two years ago and needed to sell now, it would fetch only around $880, resulting in a considerable loss. Silicon Valley Bank faced this dilemma as it required cash to meet withdrawal demands. As depositors grew uneasy about the bank's stability, many withdrew their funds, realizing they could earn better returns elsewhere.

A vicious cycle ensued. The bank was forced to raise funds to cover losses from selling treasuries. Although they attempted a large stock sale to stabilize their finances, panic had already set in. Prominent investors advised their VC-backed companies to withdraw their capital, causing the bank's stock to plummet. This situation spiraled, leading to an overwhelming rush of depositors seeking withdrawals.

Ultimately, failure was unavoidable. Following SVB, the collapse of Signature Bank occurred shortly thereafter, resulting in a sharp decline in other regional bank stocks, although they did recover somewhat soon after.

What Became of Silicon Valley Bank's Clients?

So, where did the customers of Silicon Valley Bank end up? First Citizens Bank struck a deal with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) to acquire the bank's deposits and loans. The FDIC assured clients that their deposits would be fully covered, even if not all funds were federally insured.

How can depositors expect to recover their money, even those with substantial balances? The government classified both banks as “systemic risks to the financial system,” allowing them to insure otherwise uninsured deposits.

Assessing the Safety of Your Bank

Given the recent bank collapses, you might wonder about the safety of your own bank. Generally, your bank is likely secure from the same fate faced by SVB and Signature Bank. However, it’s wise to check your bank's stability and whether your funds are safe.

Ensure your bank is FDIC-insured. The FDIC protects individual accounts up to $250,000 and joint accounts up to $500,000. Keeping your deposits below these limits ensures all of your funds remain secure. Choosing between a local community bank or a larger institution depends on your preferences for security and service.